Skip to content

Generic support for tosa.custom_op #39

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023
Merged

Generic support for tosa.custom_op #39

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

ttjost
Copy link

@ttjost ttjost commented Jun 1, 2023 •
edited
Loading

In a discussion between Liam and Martin, it came up that we don't need to open llvm-project every time we need to support another (element_wise) tosa.custom_op.
We essentially map one-to-one the tosa.custom_op to a math operation, when attribute implementation_attrs is set to linalg.generic.

@ttjost ttjost requested review from ljfitz and mgehre-amd June 1, 2023 14:32
@mgehre-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

This won't support my case of mapping assert to cf.assert, right?

@mgehre-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe we need a second piece of information in the custom op that says please lower me via the TosaToLinalg generic lowering.
E.g. we could check whether the .getIdentifierAttr() starts with math., or use another attribute on the op.

@ttjost
Copy link
Author

ttjost commented Jun 1, 2023

This won't support my case of mapping assert to cf.assert, right?

So, neither this nor the previous solution would work I believe. We are actually encapsulating the operation in a linalg.generic operation. Would that be similar for the cf.assert ?

ljfitz
ljfitz approved these changes Jun 1, 2023
View reviewed changes
@mgehre-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

This won't support my case of mapping assert to cf.assert, right?

So, neither this nor the previous solution would work I believe. We are actually encapsulating the operation in a linalg.generic operation. Would that be similar for the cf.assert ?

Right, but at least the previous solution would do nothing when seeing a custom.op with name assert. This one would likely crash the compiler because the assert needs more special handling than just replacing it by a single op.

@ttjost ttjost force-pushed the tiagot.generic_support_tosa_custom_op branch from f34bd30 to 08a8c9f Compare June 1, 2023 15:25
@ttjost
Copy link
Author

ttjost commented Jun 1, 2023

This won't support my case of mapping assert to cf.assert, right?

So, neither this nor the previous solution would work I believe. We are actually encapsulating the operation in a linalg.generic operation. Would that be similar for the cf.assert ?

Right, but at least the previous solution would do nothing when seeing a custom.op with name assert. This one would likely crash the compiler because the assert needs more special handling than just replacing it by a single op.

So, as discussed offline, it makes no sense to support assert here. For one, tosa.custom_op takes tensor as inputs, and secondly, the cf.assert would be wrapped in a linalg.generic op.

@ljfitz
Copy link
Collaborator

ljfitz commented Jun 1, 2023

It isn't clear to me why we it is essential to map the custom op as linalg.generic+op-on-scalar as, at least today, math.cos etc. also work on tensors.

If it is important to do so, would one of the items we're currently filling in with UNDEF to give the traits needed to decide if .generic+op-on-scalar rewriting is appropriate, or it should be e.g. a direct replacement, or untouched (so full conversion would fail)?

@ttjost
Copy link
Author

ttjost commented Jun 1, 2023

It isn't clear to me why we it is essential to map the custom op as linalg.generic+op-on-scalar as, at least today, math.cos etc. also work on tensors.

If it is important to do so, would one of the items we're currently filling in with UNDEF to give the traits needed to decide if .generic+op-on-scalar rewriting is appropriate, or it should be e.g. a direct replacement, or untouched (so full conversion would fail)?

This certainly deserves more discussion.

@ttjost ttjost force-pushed the tiagot.generic_support_tosa_custom_op branch from 08a8c9f to 5de799c Compare June 2, 2023 10:26
@ttjost
Copy link
Author

ttjost commented Jun 2, 2023

The PR was updated to only decompose tosa.custom_op into a scalar math ops when implementation_attr attribute is set to linalg.generic. We can revisit this later in case we want to make use of tensor or vectors for these ops.

@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd merged commit 115147d into misc_fixes Jun 2, 2023
mgehre-amd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
Revert "[Coro] [async] Disable inlining in async coroutine splitting (l…
2e29c91 
…lvm#80904)"

This reverts commit b1ac052.

This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention
functions. In this example:

```ll
; ModuleID = 'repro.ll'
source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo"
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

@0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 }

define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 {
  ret void
}

define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 {
  %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0)
  %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null)
  %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0
  %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume()
  store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8
  %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison)
  ret void
}

define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 {
  ret ptr %0
}

; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind
declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1

; Function Attrs: nounwind
declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2

; Function Attrs: nounwind
declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2

; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind
declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1

attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" }
attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind }
attributes #2 = { nounwind }
```

This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with

```
cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts
  musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison)
LLVM ERROR: Broken function
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0
 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28
 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22
 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20
 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36
 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520)
 #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76
 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10
 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10
 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6
 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7
 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40
 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23
 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69
 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28
 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70
 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32
 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41
 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24
 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7
 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7
 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7
 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14
 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12
 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13
 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3
 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12
 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3
 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18
 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3
 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20
 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74
 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3
 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20
 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33
 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17
 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7
 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7
 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7
 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10
 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27
 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33
 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16
 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20
 #43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5
 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335)
Aborted (core dumped)
@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd deleted the tiagot.generic_support_tosa_custom_op branch September 3, 2024 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ljfitz ljfitz ljfitz approved these changes

@mgehre-amd mgehre-amd mgehre-amd approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ttjost @mgehre-amd @ljfitz