-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
First set of tests #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@tannewt tagging you :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making new PRs! Please remove the mpy files because they will be auto generated.
@kattni @sommersoft what do you think about us renaming the files in source as examples so they get bundled as such. That way you just download a bundle onto a new board and can test it.
@tannewt Removed .mpy files |
@tannewt I don't understand what you're suggesting. Please clarify. |
I think I understand what @tannewt is saying, but I'll wait for his clarification. Further, is this going into the bundle? If so, it will need some cookiecutter action applied, I imagine. If not, I guess we could write an "adabot-like" to handle local bundling/releasing. |
@ShawnHymel Thanks! @kattni @sommersoft I'm thinking we rename the source folder to examples and the individual files to match our naming scheme for examples. That way they'll end up in the bundle and not need any extra install when testing on a new board. Yes, that will need cookiecutter-ification but I wasn't going to ask Shawn to do that in this PR. Should we just merge and rename the files when we cookiecutter? |
@tannewt As long as every file begins with If you want this merged before that, we should wait to rename the source folder until we cookiecutter it. |
In re-visiting my thoughts, I see it a little differently. Everything in As a "non-voting" member, my thoughts should be weighted. 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm approving and merging so @ShawnHymel can move forward.
I agree with @sommersoft about it being a package but also think we should be able to run each test individually.
I also agree with @kattni and am leaving the naming as is. |
Moved from original circuitpython repo. Initial set of tests for onboard LED, GPIO, battery/voltage monitor pins, UART, SPI, I2C, SD card (SPI), and SD chip detect (CD) pin.