Skip to content

fix(drawer): show backdrop in "side" mode if hasBackdrop is explicitly set to true #10251

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2018

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Mar 3, 2018

Currently we only use hasBackdrop to hide the backdrop, however setting it to true explicitly also expresses an intent that the consumer might want the backdrop to always be shown. These changes make it so backdrop will also be shown for side drawers if hasBackdrop is set to true.

…y set to true

Currently we only use `hasBackdrop` to hide the backdrop, however setting it to `true` explicitly also expresses an intent that the consumer might want the backdrop to always be shown. These changes make it so backdrop will also be shown for `side` drawers if `hasBackdrop` is set to `true`.
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from mmalerba as a code owner March 3, 2018 16:33
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Mar 3, 2018
}

private _isDrawerOpen(drawer: MatDrawer | null): boolean {
private _isDrawerOpen(drawer: MatDrawer | null): drawer is MatDrawer {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this a mistake or some crazy typescript thing I don't know about?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a crazy TS thing. It lets TS know that from now on the drawer is going to be a MatDrawer rather than a MatDrawer | null.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very cool

@mmalerba mmalerba added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release and removed pr: needs review labels Mar 5, 2018
@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit 583fe15 into angular:master Mar 6, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants