Skip to content

fix(drag-n-drop): ignore consecutive touchmove events on drag item on multitouch #15923

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2019

Conversation

anotherpit
Copy link
Contributor

Bumped into an inconsistent behaviour on multitouch. Currently the DragDropRegistry is designed atop of Set, and assumes there could be only one pointer active on item. Which is not true for multitouch devices.



So there’re two ways to fix it:

  1. Teach DragDropRegistry to respect multiple simultaneous pointers on one item.
  2. Stick to Set as designed initially, respect only the first pointer on item, and properly ignore all consecutive pointers.

The first way looks much more promising, but requires much more effort and requires attention of core team, I suppose. The second one is not that flexible, but is still more consistent than the current implementation. So this commit implements the second way.

… multitouch

Bumped into an inconsistent behaviour on multitouch. Currently the DragDropRegistry is designed atop of Set, and assumes there could be only one pointer active on item. Which is not true for multitouch devices.



So there’re two ways to fix it:
1. Teach DragDropRegistry to respect multiple simultaneous pointers on one item.
2. Stick to Set as designed initially, respect only the first pointer on item, and properly ignore all consecutive pointers.

The first way looks much more promising, but requires much more effort and requires attention of core team, I suppose. The second one is not that flexible, but is still more consistent than the current implementation. So this commit implements the second way.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Apr 28, 2019
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for the most part, but needs a bit of cleanup.

Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels May 16, 2019
@josephperrott josephperrott merged commit 3b1ae05 into angular:master Jun 3, 2019
RudolfFrederiksen pushed a commit to RudolfFrederiksen/material2 that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants