Skip to content

feat(youtube-player): Add documentation to the README #16925

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2019

Conversation

YourDeveloperFriend
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Aug 30, 2019
onInit() {
// This code loads the IFrame Player API code asynchronously, according to the instructions at
// https://developers.google.com/youtube/iframe_api_reference#Getting_Started
var tag = document.createElement('script');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use const instead of var.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also if somebody took this example verbatim, wouldn't they get a new script tag for every time the user visits a page? Couldn't we somehow handle this for the consumer from inside the YouTube player package?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also if somebody took this example verbatim, wouldn't they get a new script tag for every time the user visits a page?

They would get a new script tag for every instance of this example component that they inject.

Couldn't we somehow handle this for the consumer from inside the YouTube player package?

The problem is that this is not necessarily the technique that the user would use to inject the script into their page. They could bundle the script into their binary, or download it via npm.

If we try to resolve this problem on their behalf, we then have to figure out whether or not the script has already been loaded, which is impossible if it's in the process of loading and hasn't loaded yet. This would require some kind of inter-component coordination, probably through a service. Anyways, it's certainly an option.

@YourDeveloperFriend YourDeveloperFriend force-pushed the documentation branch 2 times, most recently from 373d6fa to 8c7ece9 Compare September 6, 2019 20:52
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release docs This issue is related to documentation labels Sep 6, 2019
@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit f02fb47 into angular:master Sep 6, 2019
@YourDeveloperFriend YourDeveloperFriend deleted the documentation branch September 6, 2019 21:48
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 7, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement docs This issue is related to documentation target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants