Skip to content

refactor: fix ripple-renderer in TS3.7 #17927

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2019
Merged

refactor: fix ripple-renderer in TS3.7 #17927

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

mprobst
Copy link
Contributor

@mprobst mprobst commented Dec 11, 2019

Another DOM style nullable issue.

Another DOM style nullable issue.
@mprobst mprobst requested a review from crisbeto December 11, 2019 14:32
@mprobst mprobst requested a review from devversion as a code owner December 11, 2019 14:32
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Dec 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, the CI failure looks like a flake. Marking as safe, because it doesn't change any runtime code or public-facing types.

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Dec 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@devversion devversion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Wondering if we should just add a test job with TS 3.7 to catch such issues. Looks like ripple-render was not the only place (according to #17900)

@mprobst
Copy link
Contributor Author

mprobst commented Dec 11, 2019 via email

@devversion
Copy link
Member

@mprobst Yeah that's fair. It shouldn't be much effort to have a job for that though. I don't know.. probably not a priority either.

@mprobst
Copy link
Contributor Author

mprobst commented Dec 11, 2019 via email

@devversion
Copy link
Member

Yeah totally reasonable. Sounds good to me. That helped understanding the process.

@mmalerba mmalerba merged commit 8fd9d7d into master Dec 11, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants