Skip to content

build: avoid use of ts-node wrapper script as it breaks child process forking #1703

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2022

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

ts-node spawns a custom node launcher script and has a brotli-base64
encoded configuration that will point to the user-provided entry-point.

This breaks child process forking as we wouldn't be able to specify our
custom build worker and basically ng-dev would run inside ng-dev
again.

… forking

`ts-node` spawns a custom node launcher script and has a brotli-base64
encoded configuration that will point to the user-provided entry-point.

This breaks child process forking as we wouldn't be able to specify our
custom build worker and basically `ng-dev` would run inside `ng-dev`
again.
@devversion devversion requested a review from atscott June 23, 2022 12:53
@atscott atscott added target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release action: merge Ready to merge labels Jun 23, 2022
@atscott atscott merged commit 7e91830 into angular:main Jun 23, 2022
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge Ready to merge target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants