-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Troubleshooting error 502 "upstream sent too big header while reading response header from upstream" #676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
dunglas
merged 3 commits into
api-platform:2.3
from
sushicodeur:doc-upstream-sent-too-big-header-502-errors
Dec 20, 2018
Merged
Troubleshooting error 502 "upstream sent too big header while reading response header from upstream" #676
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The value used here for
fastcgi_buffers
seems very atypical, and is probably a complete overkill for most cases.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you suggest to use a lower value by default? The size of header can grow very fastly when the invalidation mechanism is enabled...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think 32k is enough in most of case, 256k seems very very high.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like:
(Copied from somewhere around the Internet lol)
@dunglas:
We often forget how big a kilobyte actually is when it comes to text. 😄
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the response header grows past 32 KB because of the cache tags, I think it's a feature for it to not work, because you have a very serious problem. 😆
Assuming each cache tag is a pretty long IRI of 100 characters each, that'd take more than 300 IRIs... You're likely to run into api-platform/api-platform#721 🙈
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for this strange buffer values, it doesn't mean a lot to me, so I though the bigger the better :)
Should this troubleshooting put an accent on the
shortName
annotation to have shorter urls as a way to reduce the size of sent headers ?