Skip to content

Remove temporary japicmp exclusion for ivs model change #2776

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 21, 2021
Merged

Remove temporary japicmp exclusion for ivs model change #2776

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

cenedhryn
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have read the README document
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@cenedhryn cenedhryn requested a review from zoewangg October 21, 2021 16:08
@cenedhryn cenedhryn merged commit fe07efb into master Oct 21, 2021
@cenedhryn cenedhryn deleted the salande/restore-japicmp-ivs branch March 7, 2022 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zoewangg zoewangg zoewangg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@cenedhryn @zoewangg