Skip to content

Add config class for SplittingTransformer #4939

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2024

Conversation

davidh44
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

Modifications

Add SplitTransformerConfiguration for when calling AsyncResponseTransformer.split()

Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@davidh44 davidh44 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2024 22:44
}

/**
* Create a {@link FileRequestBodyConfiguration.Builder}, used to create a {@link SplitTransformerConfiguration}.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does this mention FileRequestBodyConfiguration?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops missed deleting that

Comment on lines 26 to 29
/**
* Configuration options for {@link AsyncResponseTransformer#split(SplitTransformerConfiguration)} to configure how the SDK
* should split the {@link AsyncResponseTransformer}.
*
Copy link
Contributor

@dagnir dagnir Feb 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This description makes me think the name is not quite right. "to configure how the SDK should split..." sounds like it's configuration for the splitting transformer (the one we're calling split on), but the name makes it sound like it's for the SplitAsyncResponseTransformer, which is the result of the split.

@zoewangg WDYT?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right, its used to instantiate a SplittingTransformer which is then passed to the SplitAsyncResponseTransformer

SplittingTransformerConfiguration?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay thanks for clarifying. In that case then yeah I vote for SplittingTransformerConfiguration

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
79.5% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint SonarLint

@davidh44 davidh44 merged commit 511205c into feature/master/s3mpu Feb 17, 2024
@davidh44 davidh44 deleted the hdavidh/split-config-class branch February 17, 2024 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants