Skip to content

Cleanup pending task comments #569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2018
Merged

Cleanup pending task comments #569

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2018

Conversation

varunnvs92
Copy link
Contributor

  • Remove fixed TODOs, ReviewBeforeRelease annotations
  • Clean up comments to remove words like "hacky"

@varunnvs92 varunnvs92 force-pushed the varunkn/CleanupTodos branch from a36cdbf to a8b58ab Compare June 22, 2018 06:38
@@ -124,8 +124,6 @@ protected final ShapeModel generateShapeModel(String javaClassName, String shape
final List<String> enumValues = shape.getEnumValues();
if (enumValues != null && !enumValues.isEmpty()) {
for (String enumValue : enumValues) {
// TODO handle useRealName if explicitly mentioned in
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did we already finish this todo?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This TODO is from v1 which was added 3 years back. I think we never prioritized it. So removed it as its not specific to v2 and not a blocker for GA.

@varunnvs92 varunnvs92 merged commit 9fd4687 into master Jun 26, 2018
@varunnvs92 varunnvs92 deleted the varunkn/CleanupTodos branch June 26, 2018 00:38
aws-sdk-java-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2019
…ac384b39

Pull request: release <- staging/5169e5d5-6f42-4acb-bd5f-e838ac384b39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants