-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 618
add process credentials provider #219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
8bb3767
to
9469034
Compare
@srchase Just a reminder: You can rebase this PR(and others) to make the checks pass. UPDATE: the check fails because of the missing the trailing empty line in the root package.json. You can ignore it |
accessKeyId, | ||
secretAccessKey, | ||
sessionToken | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one last comment: Do you really need the branching here? I believe the expiration
is optional, so it's ok to be undefined
. Just using one return will make the code cleaner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot! ship it!
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread. |
Description of changes:
Add process credential provider
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.