Skip to content

docs(clients): remove unexpected STS commands #2285

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2021

Conversation

AllanZhengYP
Copy link
Contributor

@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP commented Apr 21, 2021

Descriptions

The current client reference contains unwanted commands from STS & SSO because they are pulled from the dependencies: like AssumeRoleCommand and AssumeRoleWithSAMLCommand in the screen shot bellow:

Current ToC screenshot

Screen Shot 2021-04-21 at 9 58 14 AM

This change moves these unwanted commands to the bottom:

New ToC screenshot

Screen Shot 2021-04-21 at 9 57 53 AM

This change also provide aggregation of the waiters.

Aggregation of Waiters

Screen Shot 2021-04-21 at 9 58 34 AM


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

This change also adds waiters section to the ToC
@aws-sdk-js-automation
Copy link

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sdk-staging-test
  • Commit ID: 3455c9c
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP requested a review from trivikr April 23, 2021 16:11
@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP merged commit 1c23ab7 into aws:main Apr 26, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants