Skip to content

docs(upgrading): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades #3331

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Svjard
Copy link

@Svjard Svjard commented Feb 18, 2022

Issue

N/A

Description

Updates the example code under the httpOptions for upgrades to use the correct import of httpAgent.

Testing

N/A

Additional context

N/A


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@Svjard Svjard requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2022 17:30
@Svjard Svjard changed the title [DOC] Fix minor type in the agent example for upgrades fix(upgrading.md): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades Feb 18, 2022
@Svjard Svjard changed the title fix(upgrading.md): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades docs(upgrading.md): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades Feb 22, 2022
@Svjard Svjard changed the title docs(upgrading.md): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades docs(upgrading): Typo in the agent import example for upgrades Feb 22, 2022
@ajredniwja
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR should be fixed in #3677

@ajredniwja ajredniwja closed this Jun 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants