Skip to content

chore: update JSON client packages #699

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 9, 2020

Conversation

trivikr
Copy link
Member

@trivikr trivikr commented Jan 9, 2020

Issue #, if available:
Updates to packages with CodeGen fixes from:

Description of changes:
update JSON client packages

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link
Contributor

@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@aws-sdk-js-automation

This comment has been minimized.

@trivikr trivikr force-pushed the update-clients-serializer branch from 9e08d93 to c87279f Compare January 9, 2020 21:42
@aws-sdk-js-automation

This comment has been minimized.

@aws-sdk-js-automation
Copy link

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@trivikr trivikr merged commit 497b738 into aws:smithy-codegen Jan 9, 2020
@trivikr trivikr deleted the update-clients-serializer branch January 9, 2020 22:10
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 16, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 16, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants