Skip to content

documentation: add context for pytorch #3352

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

teebkeng-aws
Copy link
Collaborator

@teebkeng-aws teebkeng-aws commented Sep 7, 2022

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes: I'm adding some updates to the PyTorch docs to document a new parameter ('context') that customers can use for multi-GPU use cases. This update was brought up to the doc team by Wei Chu (@weichu), and the content has been approved by them.

Testing done: Ran the following tox tests locally and passed: black-check,flake8,pylint,docstyle,sphinx,doc8

Build preview: http://dev-dsk-teebkeng-2a-0310d08d.us-west-2.amazon.com/sdk_website/html/frameworks/pytorch/using_pytorch.html#load-a-model

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link
Contributor

@waytrue17 waytrue17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: ca08ab3
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3352 (4018794) into master (b4ea839) will decrease coverage by 0.85%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3352      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.01%   89.16%   -0.86%     
==========================================
  Files         868      204     -664     
  Lines       76892    18989   -57903     
==========================================
- Hits        69213    16931   -52282     
+ Misses       7679     2058    -5621     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...10/site-packages/sagemaker/serverless/predictor.py
...hon3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/chainer/__init__.py
.../cli/compatibility/v2/modifiers/training_params.py
...python3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/model_metrics.py
...lib/python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/parameter.py
...python3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/sparkml/model.py
...n3.7/site-packages/sagemaker/pytorch/processing.py
....7/site-packages/sagemaker/huggingface/__init__.py
...7/site-packages/sagemaker/amazon/linear_learner.py
...hon3.9/site-packages/sagemaker/sklearn/__init__.py
... and 1062 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: ca08ab3
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: ca08ab3
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: ca08ab3
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: ca08ab3
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@aaronmarkham aaronmarkham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I would suggest running this update on your fork on your own RTD instance and providing the link in the PR description... just so we're really sure that the website looks right.

@teebkeng-aws
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@knikure knikure self-requested a review September 29, 2022 18:27
Copy link
Member

@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run slow-tests

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 4018794
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mufaddal-rohawala mufaddal-rohawala merged commit f38b620 into aws:master Sep 29, 2022
@vikas0203 vikas0203 assigned vikas0203 and unassigned vikas0203 Sep 30, 2022
@vikas0203 vikas0203 self-requested a review September 30, 2022 15:05
JoseJuan98 pushed a commit to JoseJuan98/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants