-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
[Fix] Switch to subprocess in ModelBuilder when capturing dependencies #4556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Minor just update the title and description : progress -> process |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4556 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.44% 87.44%
=======================================
Files 389 389
Lines 36888 36889 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 32256 32257 +1
Misses 4632 4632 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
||
os.system(command) | ||
subprocess.run(command, check=True, capture_output=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we write a UT for test? Can you confirm how this was tested
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/bot run pr
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
aws#4556) * [Fix] Switch to subprogress in ModelBuilder when capturing dependencies * Fix style issues and explicitly set check to true
aws#4556) * [Fix] Switch to subprogress in ModelBuilder when capturing dependencies * Fix style issues and explicitly set check to true
Issue #, if available:
Description of changes:
Testing done:
Merge Checklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.General
Tests
unique_name_from_base
to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.