Skip to content

Support for non-daemon threads in the ConfigurationPoller #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Support for non-daemon threads in the ConfigurationPoller #1

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

masneyb
Copy link

@masneyb masneyb commented May 9, 2013

The ConfigurationPoller always created a non-daemon thread. This patch uses
the ConnectionFactory.isDaemon() method to determine how the thread should
be created.

rajaprabhu and others added 6 commits November 28, 2012 23:24
* Introducing Dynamic and Static client modes for the memcached client.
  Dynamic allows the client to automatically pick up the node list using
  the ElastiCache configuration endpoint throughout the lifetime of the
  client object. Static mode is the existing behavior, where the client
  is initialized only once using the configuration provided by the user.

* Support for a new configuration command used in ElastiCache Nodes.
  This command supports the config get, set and delete commands in ASCII
  and binary mode.

* Periodic poller to check for node list changes in the ElastiCache
  cluster and dynamically update client connections according to the
  configuration.  This operates only in Dynamic mode.

* In dynamic mode, if IP addresses are specified in the configuration,
  then the connection is established using the IP address directly.

For more information, please see
http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonElastiCache/latest/UserGuide/AutoDiscovery.html
…h uses

the ConnectionFactory.isDaemon() method to determine how the thread should
be created.
@masneyb
Copy link
Author

masneyb commented Jan 15, 2016

I'm recreating the pull request that applies cleanly against the latest code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants