Skip to content

Replaces it with the updated list-compatible syntax #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Musthaq101
Copy link
Contributor

@Musthaq101 Musthaq101 commented Dec 31, 2024

what

  • Replace the legacy "attribute-only" splat expressions which use the sequence .* with the newer expression[*]

why

Earlier versions of the Terraform language had a slightly different version of splat expressions, which Terraform continues to support for backward compatibility. This older variant is less useful than the modern form described above, and so Hashicorp recommends against using it in new configurations.

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Terraform configuration syntax for list handling
    • Minor formatting adjustment in output file

@Musthaq101 Musthaq101 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 12:26
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves minor syntax updates in a PostgreSQL user module's Terraform configuration. The changes primarily focus on updating list access notation from the deprecated .* to the more current [*] syntax. Additionally, a minor formatting change was made in the outputs.tf file by adding a newline at the end of the document. These modifications are purely syntactical and do not alter the underlying functionality of the configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/modules/postgresql-user/main.tf Updated list access syntax from .* to [*] for random_password and postgresql_role resources
src/outputs.tf Added a newline at the end of the file

Poem

🐰 Terraform's syntax, a rabbit's delight,
From dot-star to square brackets, now just right!
A newline here, a bracket there,
Code clean and crisp beyond compare.
Hop along, configuration so neat! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b97c43 and 759b134.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/outputs.tf (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/outputs.tf
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Mergify Merge Protections
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Important

Description is necessary and should not be empty.

Kindly provide details with what was changed, why it was changed.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟠 Require terratest

Waiting checks: test/terratest.

This rule require terratest status

  • check-success = test/terratest

@Musthaq101
Copy link
Contributor Author

Musthaq101 commented Dec 31, 2024

@bot /terratest

@Musthaq101
Copy link
Contributor Author

/terratest

@Musthaq101
Copy link
Contributor Author

Important

Description is necessary and should not be empty.

Kindly provide details with what was changed, why it was changed.

Description details added..

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-test Needs testing label Dec 31, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6b4182 and 084111d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/outputs.tf (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/outputs.tf (1)

Line range hint 1-19: LGTM! Modern splat expression syntax is already in use

The existing outputs correctly use the recommended [*] syntax for splat expressions, which aligns with the PR objectives. The null handling and map operations are also implemented correctly.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Important

Cloud Posse Engineering Team Review Required

This pull request modifies files that require Cloud Posse's review. Please be patient, and a core maintainer will review your changes.

To expedite this process, reach out to us on Slack in the #pr-reviews channel.

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-cloudposse Needs Cloud Posse assistance label Dec 31, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/terratest.yml (1)

32-32: Add a newline at the end of the file.

A trailing newline at EOF is a best practice for version control systems and text editors, as it can prevent warnings and formatting issues.

    go test -v
+ 
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 084111d and 41bec5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/terratest.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/hello_world_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/terratest.yml

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/terratest.yml

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/hello_world_test.go (3)

1-2: Package declaration is well-structured.

Using package test ensures that the test code remains logically separated from main module code, keeping test dependencies clean.


3-8: Imports are appropriate for Terratest usage.

All required modules (terratest and testify/assert) are properly declared, providing the necessary testing utility functions.


10-29: Clear and concise test setup with Terratest.

  • Parallel test execution (t.Parallel()) is a good practice for improving test scalability.
  • Terraform options create a succinct configuration targeting ../ directory.
  • Use of defer terraform.Destroy ensures cleanup of test resources.
  • The assertion checking the hello_world output aligns well with the declared output in your Terraform module.

Everything appears consistent, straightforward, and easy to maintain.

.github/workflows/terratest.yml (2)

17-17: Consider updating to stable or higher versions of actions/checkout if required.

Static analysis hints suggest the runner might be outdated. However, version v3 is a commonly used stable release. If your environment requires a newer release, consider updating.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


20-20: Confirm usage of actions/setup-go@v4 is compatible with your environment.

Similarly, verify you’re on the supported runner environment for actions/setup-go@v4 to ensure smooth pipeline runs.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

@RoseSecurity
Copy link
Contributor

/terratest

@goruha goruha self-assigned this Jan 4, 2025
goruha
goruha previously requested changes Jan 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@goruha goruha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Musthaq101 could you please drop your test as it's not follow terraform components testing pattern and would not be supported by CI/CD

@Musthaq101 Musthaq101 requested review from a team as code owners January 6, 2025 07:32
@mergify mergify bot dismissed goruha’s stale review January 6, 2025 07:32

This Pull Request was updated, so we're dismissing all reviews.

@Musthaq101
Copy link
Contributor Author

Musthaq101 commented Jan 6, 2025

@goruha

I have dropped testing of terraform code using go file in this PR.
https://github.com/cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-aurora-mysql/pull/11/files

I have taken your PR for aws-aurora-mysql as a template or example for testing pattern, will come up with another PR following your testing pattern for the same repository.

Thanks for your inputs.

@goruha goruha merged commit 4bc7180 into cloudposse-terraform-components:main Jan 6, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-cloudposse Needs Cloud Posse assistance label Jan 6, 2025
@goruha
Copy link
Contributor

goruha commented Jan 6, 2025

@Musthaq101, thanks for your contribution

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

These changes were released in v1.536.0.

Copy link

mergify bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟠 Require terratest

Waiting checks: test/terratest.

This rule require terratest status

  • check-success = test/terratest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-test Needs testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants