Skip to content

New option compareWithImage to compare a screenshot with a custom f… #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2021

Conversation

puneet0191
Copy link
Member

…ile (#90)

  • Add option compareWithImage

  • Cleanup changes from previous commit

  • Document changes for compareWithImage option

  • Improve compareWithImage documentation

  • Fix issues from previous commit

  1. Code ignored the flag config.prepareBaseImage
  2. There was a typo in the function name _getBaseImageName()

…ile (#90)

* Add option `compareWithImage`

* Cleanup changes from previous commit

* Document changes for `compareWithImage` option

* Improve `compareWithImage` documentation

* Fix issues from previous commit

1. Code ignored the flag `config.prepareBaseImage`
2. There was a typo in the function name `_getBaseImageName()`
@puneet0191 puneet0191 merged commit 18cb220 into 1.9.4 Aug 10, 2021
@puneet0191 puneet0191 deleted the 1.9.5 branch August 10, 2021 12:31
puneet0191 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2021
* New option `compareWithImage` to compare a screenshot with a custom file (#90) (#91)

* Add option `compareWithImage`

* Cleanup changes from previous commit

* Document changes for `compareWithImage` option

* Improve `compareWithImage` documentation

* Fix issues from previous commit

1. Code ignored the flag `config.prepareBaseImage`
2. There was a typo in the function name `_getBaseImageName()`

Co-authored-by: Philipp Stracker <[email protected]>

* Update Version

Co-authored-by: Philipp Stracker <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants