Skip to content

[CG-10833] feat: remove unpacking assignment #505

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

tkfoss
Copy link
Contributor

@tkfoss tkfoss commented Feb 14, 2025

Motivation

Content

Testing

Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

  • I have added tests for my changes
  • I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as needed

@tkfoss tkfoss requested review from codegen-team and a team as code owners February 14, 2025 18:07
Copy link
Contributor

@bagel897 bagel897 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forward from other pr, can we do _smart_remove instead of overriding remove?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@tkfoss
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkfoss commented Feb 14, 2025

Forward from other pr, can we do _smart_remove instead of overriding remove?

I need to know what Assignment it's being called on and remove dissolves it into Value which does not preserve the distinction, if there is a better idea than override let me know

@tkfoss tkfoss merged commit 68abcbc into develop Feb 20, 2025
24 of 26 checks passed
@tkfoss tkfoss deleted the tom-cg-10833-feat-remove-unpacking-assignment branch February 20, 2025 17:36
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.26.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants