Skip to content

fixes parsing issues and github links #72

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

jemeza-codegen
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Fix to github links in docs and parsing issues

Content

Testing

Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

  • I have added tests for my changes
  • I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as needed
  • I have read and agree to the Contributor License Agreement

@jemeza-codegen jemeza-codegen changed the title fixes parsing issues and github linkgs fixes parsing issues and github links Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@codegen-team codegen-team left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@jemeza-codegen jemeza-codegen merged commit e9f8401 into develop Jan 24, 2025
7 of 12 checks passed
@jemeza-codegen jemeza-codegen deleted the parsing-issues-gh-links branch January 24, 2025 19:29
jayhack pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2025
# Motivation
Fix to github links in docs and parsing issues

# Content
<!-- Please include a summary of the change -->
# Testing
<!-- How was the change tested? -->
# Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

- [x] I have added tests for my changes
- [x] I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as
needed
- [x] I have read and agree to the [Contributor License
Agreement](../CLA.md)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants