Skip to content

fix: CG-17050: skip codebase init if repo operator is none #999

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

caroljung-cg
Copy link
Contributor

@caroljung-cg caroljung-cg commented Apr 1, 2025

Motivation

Safe handling of trying to clone a revoked github token

Content

Testing

Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

  • I have added tests for my changes
  • I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as needed

@caroljung-cg caroljung-cg requested review from codegen-team and a team as code owners April 1, 2025 17:47
@caroljung-cg caroljung-cg enabled auto-merge (squash) April 1, 2025 17:55
@caroljung-cg caroljung-cg merged commit f47955f into develop Apr 1, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@caroljung-cg caroljung-cg deleted the cg-17050-handle-exception branch April 1, 2025 18:02
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.52.29 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Zeeeepa added a commit to Zeeeepa/codegen that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
Original commit by Carol Jung: fix: CG-17050: skip codebase init if repo operator is none (codegen-sh#999)

# Motivation

<!-- Why is this change necessary? -->

# Content

<!-- Please include a summary of the change -->

# Testing

<!-- How was the change tested? -->

# Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

- [ ] I have added tests for my changes
- [ ] I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as
needed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants