Skip to content

Dont use conda emsdk #361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mcbarton
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcbarton mcbarton commented Dec 2, 2024

This PR will update the ci to match what is done in xeus-cpp, by not using emsdk from conda

@mcbarton mcbarton requested a review from vgvassilev December 2, 2024 20:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.55%. Comparing base (f794dee) to head (1950592).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #361   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.55%   74.55%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        3211     3211           
=======================================
  Hits         2394     2394           
  Misses        817      817           

Copy link
Contributor

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

@vgvassilev
Copy link
Contributor

Consider using squash on merge and more descriptive commit message.

@mcbarton mcbarton merged commit 063718d into compiler-research:main Dec 2, 2024
42 checks passed
@mcbarton mcbarton deleted the dont-use-conda-emsdk branch December 2, 2024 23:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants