Skip to content

[lib] Referring to standard library requirements. #1263

Open
@jensmaurer

Description

@jensmaurer

First, we have a mixture of "shall satisfy" (89) and "shall meet" (61). What's the preferred phrase?

Second, for CopyConstructible etc., we sometimes cross-reference the table number and sometimes the section. What's the preference here?

Third, for CopyConstructible etc., we sometimes say "shall meet/satisfy the CopyConstructible requirements" and sometimes we say "shall meet/satisfy the requirements of CopyConstructible". What's the preferred phrase?

For iterator requirements, we're now fairly consistently saying "shall meet/satisfy the requirements of a blah iterator (xref to section)", which is good.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions