Skip to content

Valid for rake earlier than v 12.1 #418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2016
Merged

Valid for rake earlier than v 12.1 #418

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2016

Conversation

BryanH
Copy link
Contributor

@BryanH BryanH commented Dec 12, 2016

Current Rake is v 12.0.0 and Gem won't install

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 12, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-53.4%) to 21.024% when pulling 99c1eb7 on BryanH:feature/rake_v_12.0 into 1a64730 on ctran:develop.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-53.4%) to 21.024% when pulling 99c1eb7 on BryanH:feature/rake_v_12.0 into 1a64730 on ctran:develop.

@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.specification_version = 4

if Gem::Version.new(Gem::VERSION) >= Gem::Version.new('1.2.0') then
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rake>, [">= 10.4", "< 12.0"])
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rake>, [">= 10.4", "< 12.1"])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why not "< 13.0" ?

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That seems like a good idea.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

12 -> 13 should break a ton of stuff if they're using semantic versioning. I tested it with 12, but I can't be sure 13 will work out of the box until I get my hands on that version and can test.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean less than 13 like "< 13" but this merged already anyway 👍

@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.specification_version = 4

if Gem::Version.new(Gem::VERSION) >= Gem::Version.new('1.2.0') then
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rake>, [">= 10.4", "< 12.0"])
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rake>, [">= 10.4", "< 12.1"])
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That seems like a good idea.

@ctran ctran merged commit bc18c3c into ctran:develop Dec 13, 2016
@ctran ctran added the refactor label Dec 17, 2016
johncarney pushed a commit to johncarney/annotate_models that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants