-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
Remove unused links from docset.yml and fix links #753
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: bmorelli25 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR removes a large number of unused and outdated links from the docset configuration and fixes link formatting issues in several markdown documentation files.
- Removed obsolete links from docset.yml to streamline the documentation source.
- Updated rollover API link formatting in fleet data streams scenario documents.
- Revised the Sysmon integration link in the auditbeat migration guide for improved clarity.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
File | Description |
---|---|
docset.yml | Removed multiple unused/outdated link entries to simplify the docset configuration. |
reference/ingestion-tools/fleet/data-streams-scenario1.md | Fixed rollover API link formatting to use explicit URLs. |
reference/ingestion-tools/fleet/data-streams-scenario2.md | Corrected rollover API link formatting with explicit markdown links. |
reference/ingestion-tools/fleet/migrate-auditbeat-to-agent.md | Updated the Sysmon integration link for clarity in reference documentation. |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
docset.yml:66
- Ensure that the removal of unused links (such as the functionbeat-ref entry) does not break any existing references within the documentation.
- functionbeat-ref: "https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/beats/functionbeat/current"
reference/ingestion-tools/fleet/data-streams-scenario1.md:76
- The use of the placeholder '{{es}}' before the rollover API link may lead to unresolved values; consider verifying that this placeholder is intended or removing it if not needed.
New ILM policies only take effect when new indices are created, so you either must wait for a rollover to occur (usually after 30 days or when the index size reaches 50 GB), or force a rollover of each data stream using the {{es}} [rollover API](https://www.elastic.co/docs/api/doc/elasticsearch/operation/operation-indices-rollover).
New ILM policies only take effect when new indices are created, so you either must wait for a rollover to occur (usually after 30 days or when the index size reaches 50 GB), or force a rollover of the data stream using the {{es}} [rollover API](https://www.elastic.co/docs/api/doc/elasticsearch/operation/operation-indices-rollover): | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similarly, the '{{es}}' placeholder before the rollover API link should be checked to ensure it renders as intended or is removed for clarity.
New ILM policies only take effect when new indices are created, so you either must wait for a rollover to occur (usually after 30 days or when the index size reaches 50 GB), or force a rollover of the data stream using the {{es}} [rollover API](https://www.elastic.co/docs/api/doc/elasticsearch/operation/operation-indices-rollover): | |
New ILM policies only take effect when new indices are created, so you either must wait for a rollover to occur (usually after 30 days or when the index size reaches 50 GB), or force a rollover of the data stream using the [Elasticsearch](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current) [rollover API](https://www.elastic.co/docs/api/doc/elasticsearch/operation/operation-indices-rollover): |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I appreciate the suggestion, but no.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✨
Signed-off-by: bmorelli25 <[email protected]>
No description provided.