Skip to content

Switch to minimist in run-validations.js #3825

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pquentin
Copy link
Member

This avoids parsing the 9.0 branch as a number, which is treated as 9.

This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.
@pquentin pquentin merged commit a93f4d7 into main Feb 24, 2025
22 checks passed
@pquentin pquentin deleted the run-validation-minimist branch February 24, 2025 17:05
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <[email protected]>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <[email protected]>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <[email protected]>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <[email protected]>
pquentin added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
This avoids parsing the `9.0` branch as a number, which is treated as
`9`.

(cherry picked from commit a93f4d7)

Co-authored-by: Quentin Pradet <[email protected]>
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants