Skip to content

Docs: IsAdmin permissions changed to IsAdminUser #8227

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2021
Merged

Docs: IsAdmin permissions changed to IsAdminUser #8227

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/api-guide/viewsets.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ You may inspect these attributes to adjust behaviour based on the current action
if self.action == 'list':
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
else:
permission_classes = [IsAdmin]
permission_classes = [IsAdminUser]
return [permission() for permission in permission_classes]

## Marking extra actions for routing
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/community/3.9-announcement.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ You can now compose permission classes using the and/or operators, `&` and `|`.
For example...

```python
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated & (ReadOnly | IsAdmin)]
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated & (ReadOnly | IsAdminUser)]
```

If you're using custom permission classes then make sure that you are subclassing
Expand Down