Skip to content

Finish implementing SAML provider config. #428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2020

Conversation

micahstairs
Copy link
Contributor

@micahstairs micahstairs commented May 29, 2020

I've implemented addAllX509Certificates and removed the TODOs for the request signing, since we are not ready to expose that yet.

I've also added unit tests for SamlProviderConfig.UpdateRequest, because those were missed in a previous PR.

On an unrelated note, I've also added a comment describing why 'suppressLoadErrors' needs to be set.

Copy link
Contributor

@hiranya911 hiranya911 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove the signReuqest stuff for now. Other changes LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@hiranya911 hiranya911 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@micahstairs micahstairs merged commit cb4d32f into idp-config Jun 3, 2020
@micahstairs micahstairs deleted the micahstairs-saml-properties branch June 3, 2020 00:18
micahstairs added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2020
I've implemented addAllX509Certificates and removed the TODOs for the request signing, since we are not ready to expose that yet.

I've also added unit tests for SamlProviderConfig.UpdateRequest, because those were missed in a previous PR.

On an unrelated note, I've also added a comment describing why 'suppressLoadErrors' needs to be set.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants