Skip to content

Work around an upcoming JDK change. #4017

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2022
Merged

Conversation

gsakakihara
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

474 tests  +161   474 ✔️ +162   3m 31s ⏱️ + 2m 28s
  27 suites  -     1       0 💤  -     1 
  27 files    -     1       0 ±    0 

Results for commit 12050be. ± Comparison against base commit 58c1677.

This pull request removes 313 and adds 474 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ addClickListener_forwardsEventListenerRequestsToDeveloperListenerManager
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ addDismissListener_forwardsEventListenerRequestsToDeveloperListenerManager
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ addDisplayErrorListener_forwardsEventListenerRequestsToDeveloperListenerManager
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ addImpressionListener_forwardsEventListenerRequestsToDeveloperListenerManager
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ automaticDataCollectionDisabling_clearsInDataCollectionHelper
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ automaticDataCollectionDisabling_disablesInDataCollectionHelper
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ automaticDataCollectionEnabling_enablesInDataCollectionHelper
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ clearDisplayListener_removesListener
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ messagesSuppressed_isFalseOnInitialization
com.google.firebase.inappmessaging.FirebaseInAppMessagingTest ‑ messagesSuppressed_isTrueWhenUpdated
…
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testBindsService_oAndTargetingO
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testNoWrappedIntent
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testNullIntent
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_OTargetingO_highPriority
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_fallsBackToBindService
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_notOButTargetingO
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_notOButTargetingO[19]
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_notOButTargetingO[21]
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_notOButTargetingO[22]
com.google.firebase.iid.FirebaseInstanceIdWithFcmReceiverRoboTest ‑ testStartsService_notOButTargetingO[23]
…

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

google-oss-bot commented Aug 22, 2022

Coverage Report 1

Affected Products

  • firebase-messaging

    Overall coverage changed from ? (58c1677) to 85.11% (301e6b4) by ?.

    41 individual files with coverage change

    FilenameBase (58c1677)Merge (301e6b4)Diff
    AutoProtoEncoderDoNotUseEncoder.java?98.17%?
    ByteStreams.java?59.72%?
    CommonNotificationBuilder.java?90.38%?
    Constants.java?92.86%?
    DisplayNotification.java?91.38%?
    EnhancedIntentService.java?76.60%?
    ExecutorFactory.java?0.00%?
    FcmBroadcastProcessor.java?93.18%?
    FcmExecutors.java?80.00%?
    FcmLifecycleCallbacks.java?89.29%?
    FirebaseInstanceIdReceiver.java?72.73%?
    FirebaseMessaging.java?75.77%?
    FirebaseMessagingRegistrar.java?100.00%?
    FirebaseMessagingService.java?94.03%?
    GmsRpc.java?83.15%?
    ImageDownload.java?93.33%?
    MessagingAnalytics.java?82.19%?
    MessagingClientEvent.java?93.58%?
    MessagingClientEventExtension.java?76.47%?
    Metadata.java?57.14%?
    NotificationParams.java?98.71%?
    PoolableExecutors.java?29.17%?
    ProtoEncoderDoNotUse.java?50.00%?
    ProxyNotificationInitializer.java?93.75%?
    ProxyNotificationPreferences.java?88.89%?
    RemoteMessage.java?95.48%?
    RemoteMessageCreator.java?88.89%?
    RequestDeduplicator.java?80.00%?
    SendException.java?100.00%?
    ServiceStarter.java?87.50%?
    SharedPreferencesQueue.java?98.65%?
    Store.java?74.19%?
    SyncTask.java?70.83%?
    ThreadPriority.java?100.00%?
    TopicOperation.java?90.00%?
    TopicsStore.java?100.00%?
    TopicsSubscriber.java?89.47%?
    TopicsSyncTask.java?53.33%?
    WakeLockHolder.java?96.08%?
    WithinAppServiceBinder.java?90.91%?
    WithinAppServiceConnection.java?84.15%?

Test Logs

Notes

  • Commit (301e6b4) is created by Prow via merging PR base commit (58c1677) and head commit (12050be).
  • Run gradle <product>:checkCoverage to produce HTML coverage reports locally. After gradle commands finished, report files can be found under <product-build-dir>/reports/jacoco/.

  1. https://storage.googleapis.com/firebase-sdk-metric-reports/AiBUAZMYey.html

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Size Report 1

Affected Products

No changes between base commit (58c1677) and merge commit (301e6b4).

Test Logs

Notes

  1. https://storage.googleapis.com/firebase-sdk-metric-reports/M4BFOO4x4p.html

Copy link
Member

@James201311 James201311 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@James201311
Copy link
Member

/retest

@gsakakihara gsakakihara merged commit f6eebe4 into master Aug 30, 2022
@gsakakihara gsakakihara deleted the gsakakihara/reflection branch August 30, 2022 00:00
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants