-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 943
Run Storage Node tests in CI #8375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Size Report 1Affected ProductsNo changes between base commit (12ba46f) and merge commit (1c097c6).Test Logs |
Size Analysis Report 1Affected ProductsNo changes between base commit (12ba46f) and merge commit (1c097c6).Test Logs |
Yes, we can't merge this into master as is. |
The script that runs the tests in CI accepts a `-s` flag we use to pass the test command we want to run in CI. We were passing two commands, and only the first one (`test:browser`) was being run, skipping the Node tests. Now we only pass one command `test`, which runs both.
c3ccbb8
to
52fb257
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My only comment would be that I guess we deliberately removed the lint job from ci tests in order to run them in a separate workflow so I think technically we make another script here that doesn't run lint (seems to be called "test:all" in other packages), but I don't think it's that important.
I agree that we shouldn't run lint when testing, but I noticed that a lot of packages do this. Is this something we want to change in all packages? |
If it's in other packages, we can do another PR that gets them all later. This PR should be good to go. |
The script that runs the tests in CI accepts a
-s
flag we can use to pass one test command we want to run in CI. We were passing two commands, and only the first one (test:browser
) was being run, skipping the Node tests. Now we only pass one commandtest
, which runs both.Since the Node tests in storage are currently failing, this means CI is now red until we fix it.
Question: Do we need to merge the fix for storage into this branch, so that we avoid CI being red in master?