-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
Add bus, receiver and message name to extra's #492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please also add a CHANGELOG entry following the pattern of the existing entries?
Are you willing to finish the implementation or is this PR abandoned? |
Not abandoned. Did I miss any of your feedback? I thought I applied it all. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see there is still some commented code here and there, and I don't understand why you switched from captureException()
to captureEvent()
. I mentioned the latter in #492 (comment) just for the sake of the example, I didn't mean you to change it
I took the time to finish this PR as I would really love to see it merged. Hopefully you don't mind I rebased the branch and pushed some changes to your code. It would be great if you could test it out before I give the final approval to be sure everything works as expected |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since all is silent, LGTM 🚢 Thanks @airoude for the work you did
Hello,
With this PR we can send extra information about the worker like busName, receiver, and the actual message object name.
In the future (when I have more time) we can add configuration for custom stamps to be sent along.