Skip to content

Filter subscriber reconciler events #18660

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023
Merged

Filter subscriber reconciler events #18660

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

aledbf
Copy link
Member

@aledbf aledbf commented Sep 5, 2023

Description

Reduce the number of events sent to subscribers to those that change the status of the workspace.
(by half during workspace creation)

Summary generated by Copilot

🤖 Generated by Copilot at a4315da

Improve subscriber controller efficiency by filtering workspace status changes. Add new packages and a filter function to subscriber_controller.go.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

How to test

Documentation

Preview status

Gitpod was successfully deployed to your preview environment.

Build Options

Build
  • /werft with-werft
    Run the build with werft instead of GHA
  • leeway-no-cache
  • /werft no-test
    Run Leeway with --dont-test
Publish
  • /werft publish-to-npm
  • /werft publish-to-jb-marketplace
Installer
  • analytics=segment
  • with-dedicated-emulation
  • workspace-feature-flags
    Add desired feature flags to the end of the line above, space separated
Preview Environment / Integration Tests
  • /werft with-local-preview
    If enabled this will build install/preview
  • /werft with-preview
  • /werft with-large-vm
  • /werft with-gce-vm
    If enabled this will create the environment on GCE infra
  • with-integration-tests=workspace
    Valid options are all, workspace, webapp, ide, jetbrains, vscode, ssh. If enabled, with-preview and with-large-vm will be enabled.
  • with-monitoring

/hold

@aledbf aledbf marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2023 19:01
@aledbf aledbf requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2023 19:01
Comment on lines +91 to +93
if !cmp.Equal(old.Spec.Ports, new.Spec.Ports) {
return true
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's the reason for doing the special comparison on ports? Should we do this comparison on the entire spec instead? E.g. there's the workspace timeout values in the spec that can change as well

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only the failure to compare Ports introduce errors in the integration tests (changing the visibility requires a notification)

@roboquat roboquat merged commit 9470fb8 into main Sep 6, 2023
@roboquat roboquat deleted the aledbf/fiilter branch September 6, 2023 14:33
WVerlaek added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
roboquat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants