Skip to content

[supervisor] cache default workspace image #18845

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

akosyakov
Copy link
Member

@akosyakov akosyakov commented Sep 29, 2023

Description

Workspace info is heavily used operation, it will trigger get default workspace image and lead to rate limiting. This PR adds a caching and put in sync section to avoid calling it very often. In the worst case a user will need to wait for 5secs before running gp validate while testing workspace image changes.

Summary generated by Copilot

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 1243353

Add a cache for the default workspace image in the supervisor's info service. This reduces the load on the Gitpod service and improves the performance of workspace startup.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

How to test

Documentation

Preview status

Gitpod was successfully deployed to your preview environment.

Build Options

Build
  • /werft with-werft
    Run the build with werft instead of GHA
  • leeway-no-cache
  • /werft no-test
    Run Leeway with --dont-test
Publish
  • /werft publish-to-npm
  • /werft publish-to-jb-marketplace
Installer
  • analytics=segment
  • with-dedicated-emulation
  • workspace-feature-flags
    Add desired feature flags to the end of the line above, space separated
Preview Environment / Integration Tests
  • /werft with-local-preview
    If enabled this will build install/preview
  • /werft with-preview
  • /werft with-large-vm
  • /werft with-gce-vm
    If enabled this will create the environment on GCE infra
  • with-integration-tests=all
    Valid options are all, workspace, webapp, ide, jetbrains, vscode, ssh. If enabled, with-preview and with-large-vm will be enabled.
  • with-monitoring

/hold

}
is.cacheMu.RUnlock()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: This should not be necessary, right?

Copy link
Member

@geropl geropl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving to unblock ✔️

@akosyakov akosyakov marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2023 15:59
@akosyakov akosyakov requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2023 15:59
@akosyakov
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@roboquat roboquat merged commit 777a9cb into main Sep 29, 2023
@roboquat roboquat deleted the ak/sup_cache_def_image branch September 29, 2023 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants