Skip to content

Fix vertical alignment on signature box #17827

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

silverwind
Copy link
Member

@silverwind silverwind commented Nov 26, 2021

Before:

Screenshot 2021-11-26 at 13 14 55

After:

Screenshot 2021-11-26 at 13 15 03

Not sure what that selector was supposed to fix, but I think it no longer applies.

@silverwind silverwind added the topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI label Nov 26, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Nov 27, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Nov 28, 2021
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.16.0 milestone Nov 28, 2021
@silverwind silverwind marked this pull request as draft November 28, 2021 09:37
@silverwind
Copy link
Member Author

Marking WIP, there is more to this as this PR misaligns it on the valid signature box.

@silverwind
Copy link
Member Author

More complete that fixes this and other issues on the commit page: #17849

@silverwind silverwind closed this Nov 28, 2021
@silverwind silverwind deleted the sign-valign branch November 28, 2021 22:48
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants