Skip to content

Unfortunately MemProvider Init does not actually Init properly (#6692) #6693

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2019

Conversation

zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

Backport #6692

…tea#6692)

* Unfortunately MemProvider Init does not actually Init properly

Worse all of its members are private and you cannot update them.
Simple fix copy it in to modules session.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]>

* Fix misspelling
@zeripath zeripath added type/bug issue/regression Indicates a previously functioning feature or behavior that has broken or regressed after a change labels Apr 20, 2019
@zeripath zeripath added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Apr 20, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Apr 20, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 20, 2019
@zeripath zeripath merged commit 497f37b into go-gitea:release/v1.8 Apr 20, 2019
@zeripath zeripath deleted the backport-6692 branch April 22, 2019 20:23
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
issue/regression Indicates a previously functioning feature or behavior that has broken or regressed after a change lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants