-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
test: command keys #9357
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: command keys #9357
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9357 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 41.37%
=========================================
Files ? 567
Lines ? 73577
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 30445
Misses ? 39330
Partials ? 3802 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
I thought we were going to migrate to the internal SSH on docker because that's the only way to get rootless docker? |
@zeripath I am for using internal ssh but I don't think that everyone are currently. |
I will maybe propose a PR in this direction and see what happen 😄 |
Investigating the keys command (to use it in docker to replace the authorized_keys file), I wrote some tests that could be useful to keep to ensure that the command is working well.