Skip to content

Java 12-17API additions #10106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Java 12-17API additions #10106

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

zbynek
Copy link
Collaborator

@zbynek zbynek commented Mar 12, 2025

Fixes #9872
Fixes #10091
Fixes #9991

@zbynek zbynek marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2025 01:37
@zbynek zbynek changed the title wip Java 12-17API additions Mar 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@niloc132 niloc132 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work on the draft - some quick feedback

assertEquals(3, hideFromCompiler("foo").transform(String::length));
}

public void testIndent() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please also include a set of these tests that does not do a hideFromCompiler, so we can make sure that if the compiler is able to constant-fold these method calls, that it does so correctly.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not implement any tests without hideFromCompiler yet since I wasn't sure which methods need them. It seems that tests either hide all inputs from compiler (like the ones from https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9975/files#diff-79013db0b72ddfb9522327d93e6c5804f44c160025590e971ddfc7fd4eb7c045R26 ) or hide nothing (https://github.com/zbynek/gwt/blob/f0c1486a46018aec9de93458136cfc161f569e81/user/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/java/lang/StringTest.java#L542 ). Also I'm not sure if it wouldn't be better to test the constant-folding optimization and verify that these are actually folded rather than make assertions where we don't know if we're testing folding or emulation.

@zbynek zbynek force-pushed the java17-emul branch 3 times, most recently from 077dfea to 55d86e0 Compare March 13, 2025 01:39
@zbynek zbynek force-pushed the java17-emul branch 4 times, most recently from 033deb4 to b6adb5d Compare March 18, 2025 06:02
@zbynek zbynek force-pushed the java17-emul branch 6 times, most recently from 0257e71 to b8996b5 Compare April 2, 2025 21:53
@zbynek zbynek marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 22:38
@zbynek zbynek force-pushed the java17-emul branch 2 times, most recently from 3f189f4 to ec661eb Compare April 5, 2025 10:04
@zbynek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zbynek commented May 1, 2025

@zbynek zbynek mentioned this pull request May 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CharSequence isEmpty method is missing Implement (or document) missing CharSequence methods New API emulation from Java version 12 - 17
3 participants