Correct references to committee to the foundation

guidelines-for-respectful-communication/index.html

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ <h2>Motivation</h2>
     </ul>
 
     <h2>Guidelines For Respectful Communication</h2>
-    <p>As members of a Haskell committee, we commit ourselves to a high standard of public behaviour. We have one over-arching rule:</p>
+    <p>As members of a Haskell Foundation, we commit ourselves to a high standard of public behaviour. We have one over-arching rule:</p>
 
     <p><b>We strive to treat every person with respect.</b></p>
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ <h2>Guidelines For Respectful Communication</h2>
 
     <p>We seek to apply these standards in all our public interactions in the Haskell sphere, including email, social media, discussion forums, and so on.</p>
 
-    <p>If one of us fails to meet these standards, the ideal course of action is to write to that person privately, gently drawing attention to their lapse. If you're not comfortable with that, please contact the chair of the committee, or (if the chair is the problem) the vice-chair or co-chair.</p>
+    <p>If one of us fails to meet these standards, the ideal course of action is to write to that person privately, gently drawing attention to their lapse. If you're not comfortable with that, please contact the chair of the Foundation, or (if the chair is the problem) the vice-chair or co-chair.</p>
 
     <p>Our response should usually be to apologise and stop doing what it was that you are unhappy about. Even if we feel we have been misinterpreted or unfairly accused, the chances are good there was something we could have communicated better, and an apology is far more likely to bring healing than is a counter-accusation.</p>