Update model-libraries.ts - add specification for WHAM

[katja-hofmann]

Configuring countDownloads for wham files with ckpt file extension

[katja-hofmann]

Hi team,

I see that this PR is waiting on lint - does this usually take this long (about 10 hours since I submitted the PR), or is there something wrong that I can correct on my side?

[julien-c]

@katja-hofmann i've approved to launch CI

[Wauplin]

Hi @katja-hofmann , thanks for your PR! Changes look good to me.

I just want to highlight that by having a single repo https://huggingface.co/microsoft/wham for both 1.6B et 200M models, you won't be able to know the number of downloads for each model. What we usually recommend to do is to create 1 repo per model (so for instance microsoft/wham-1.6B and microsoft/wham-200M) and tag them with library_name: wham. This way download counts will be separated and the door will be open to add even more models on the Hub in the future (WHAM_1.6B_v2.ckpt for instance?).

Since the repo also contains code to execute the model, you can either decide to keep the code in a single repo (e.g. 1.6B repo has the code, while others are referring to the "main" one) or to move the codebase to a GH repo for instance. Depends on what would be the easiest for you (I personally like having code+weights on HF)

Let me know what you think :) This topic is slightly orthogonal to this PR but always good to handle these things at the same time.

Note: failing CI is not related to your PR.

[Wauplin]

@katja-hofmann related to my comment above #1215 (review), let me know what you prefer to do. Should we merge this PR as-is or wait for a split in HF repos (to benefit from more granular download analytics)

[katja-hofmann]

Hi @Wauplin - thank you for your detailed comments and follow up. If you're ok with it, we'd prefer to keep the repo as is. We are not currently planning to add additional instances, and therefore prefer to keep the material in one place.

[Wauplin]

Ok fine for me, thanks for confirming!