This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2023. It is now read-only.
[SYCL][L0] Fix has_aspect_atomic64 test and reenable it #1253
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Tikhomirova, Kseniya <[email protected]>
AlexeySachkov
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2022
|
@dm-vodopyanov hello, could you please review? |
dm-vodopyanov
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2022
|
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers hello, failures are unrelated (I enabled test and it passed), could we merge it? |
myler
pushed a commit
to myler/llvm-test-suite
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2023
Fix has_aspect_atomic64 test and reenable it Signed-off-by: Tikhomirova, Kseniya <[email protected]>
aelovikov-intel
pushed a commit
to aelovikov-intel/llvm
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2023
…est-suite#1253) Fix has_aspect_atomic64 test and reenable it Signed-off-by: Tikhomirova, Kseniya <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
zeDeviceGetModuleProperties parameter ze_device_module_properties_t is an in/out parameter. It has void *pNext field where you can attach extensions to be filled too. So we should initialize the structure to not confuse backend by trash in the pNext pointer field that may lead either to hang or seg fault.
Signed-off-by: Tikhomirova, Kseniya [email protected]