-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
[SYCL] Add more tests for experimental::printf #569
[SYCL] Add more tests for experimental::printf #569
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Aims to test intel/llvm#5069. Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
/verify with intel/llvm#5069 |
The Linux/Windows CI failures in |
I suggest we update CODEOWNERS for those new files as well |
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
/verify with intel/llvm#5069 |
Together with the product PR, the unrelated DeviceLib failure on Windows is the only one. |
Allow generic address space strings into `experimental::printf` and, consequently, into `__spirv_ocl_printf` declarations. To mitigate the lack of device BE support for generic address space literals, we implement a pass to move the literal argument into constant address space whenever possible. This is a temporary solution; long-term, we should replace this with proper support of generic address-spaced format strings at the level of SPIR-V translation and device backends. Tested in intel/llvm-test-suite#569. Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
/verify with intel/llvm#5069 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't approve because I'm the initial author of the PR, but changes introduced later by @AGindinson looks good to me.
As shown by CI for intel#569, the unsupported combination of opencl && acc still shows up. Attempt to fix this by using a common operator style as a follow-up to intel#652. Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
As shown by CI for #569, the unsupported combination of opencl && acc still shows up. Attempt to fix this by using a common operator style as a follow-up to #652. Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
@AlexeySachkov, could you please revise the latest changes? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers Could you please consider merging this based on the DPC++ tools member approval? |
@AGindinson, @AlexeySachkov it looks like the new tests are failing on HIP in pre-commit: https://github.com/intel/llvm/runs/4643766953?check_suite_focus=true Please fix it ASAP |
@vladimirlaz, #685 should do the trick. Thanks! |
Auto pulldown and update tc files for xmain-cand branch on 20220118
…#569) Signed-off-by: Artem Gindinson <[email protected]>
No description provided.