Skip to content

[SYCL][CODEOWNERS] Add bindless images code owners #10921

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

stdale-intel
Copy link
Contributor

update codeowners file for

sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_bindless_images.asciidoc @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/include/sycl/ext/oneapi/bindless* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/source/detail/bindless* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/plugins/unified_runtime/ur/adapters/**/image.* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/test-e2e/bindless_images/ @intel/bindless-images-reviewers

…oneapi_bindless_images.asciidoc @intel/bindless-images-reviewers

sycl/include/sycl/ext/oneapi/bindless* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/source/detail/bindless* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/plugins/unified_runtime/ur/adapters/**/image.* @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
sycl/test-e2e/bindless_images/ @intel/bindless-images-reviewers
@stdale-intel stdale-intel requested a review from bader as a code owner August 22, 2023 05:56
@bader bader requested a review from a team August 22, 2023 14:17
Copy link
Contributor

@bader bader left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I'd like folks from @intel/bindless-images-reviewers team to confirm that they are okay with owning these files.

@isaacault isaacault requested review from isaacault and removed request for isaacault August 23, 2023 11:36
@bader bader merged commit fdee56c into intel:sycl Aug 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants