Skip to content

[SYCL][L0] Update SYCL_PI_LEVEL_ZERO_USM_ALLOCATOR description #12088

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

igchor
Copy link
Member

@igchor igchor commented Dec 6, 2023

@igchor igchor requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2023 00:05
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Feb 28, 2024

@againull, could you review this change, please?

@againull
Copy link
Contributor

@againull, could you review this change, please?

Let me redirect this to @rdeodhar please as he is the author.
@rdeodhar Could you please help to review this change.

@againull againull requested a review from rdeodhar February 28, 2024 20:37
@rdeodhar
Copy link
Contributor

The changes are OK, except, it looks like this statement is not correct:
MaxPoolSize is the maximum size of the pool, default 16MB.

MaxPoolSize appears to now be the max value of size_t. Is that the intent? If so it should be documented as such.

@igchor igchor force-pushed the update_env_var_desc branch from 793d18f to 1779b1a Compare February 29, 2024 18:51
@igchor
Copy link
Member Author

igchor commented Feb 29, 2024

The changes are OK, except, it looks like this statement is not correct: MaxPoolSize is the maximum size of the pool, default 16MB.

MaxPoolSize appears to now be the max value of size_t. Is that the intent? If so it should be documented as such.

Good catch, done.

Copy link
Contributor

@rdeodhar rdeodhar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@bader bader merged commit cefbadd into intel:sycl Mar 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants