Skip to content

Correct some cuda/sycl accuracy from 0.0 to 0.5 and add relate handling. #12213

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

FreddyLeaf
Copy link
Contributor

Several functions for "sycl" and "cuda" requires "0.5" accuracy levels, which means correctly rounded results. For now x86 host AltMathLibrary doesn't have such ability. For such accuracy level, the fpbuiltins should be replaced by equivalent IR operation or llvmbuiltins.

Several functions for "sycl" and "cuda" requires "0.5" accuracy levels,
which means correctly rounded results. For now x86 host AltMathLibrary
doesn't have such ability. For such accuracy level, the fpbuiltins
should be replaced by equivalent IR operation or llvmbuiltins.
@FreddyLeaf
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping for review

Copy link
Contributor

@premanandrao premanandrao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FE changes look okay to me, but someone else will need to check/verify the IR in the tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@andykaylor andykaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@FreddyLeaf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for review @premanandrao @andykaylor
ping @intel/dpcpp-tools-reviewers

@FreddyLeaf
Copy link
Contributor Author

FreddyLeaf commented Jan 5, 2024

ping for review @intel/dpcpp-tools-reviewers

1 similar comment
@FreddyLeaf
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping for review @intel/dpcpp-tools-reviewers

@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Jan 17, 2024

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers, this seems to be ready to land. Any objections to merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@asudarsa asudarsa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for late review. LGTM.

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel merged commit 193b4bc into sycl Jan 17, 2024
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the handle_0.5 branch January 17, 2024 23:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants