-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 787
[SYCL] Use sycl/detail/core.hpp
in test-e2e/SubGroupMask/*
#13842
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SYCL] Use sycl/detail/core.hpp
in test-e2e/SubGroupMask/*
#13842
Conversation
Continuation of changes started in intel#12890.
@@ -143,6 +143,19 @@ | |||
// CHECK-NEXT: detail/spirv.hpp | |||
// CHECK-NEXT: ext/oneapi/experimental/non_uniform_groups.hpp | |||
// CHECK-NEXT: ext/oneapi/sub_group_mask.hpp | |||
// CHECK-NEXT: builtins.hpp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Normally we would try to avoid growing this, but this change is a bugfix. The proper future change is to move the entire "sub_group_mask" extension out of core.hpp
. I expect that to happen in #13760.
@@ -15,8 +15,13 @@ | |||
// | |||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |||
|
|||
// TODO: switch to <sycl/detail/core.hpp> once we decide how feature macros |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT: Do we need this TODO? It looks like test is using core.hpp now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right. I'll remove that in a follow-up PR because I want this merged to unblock dependent changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing it as part of #13853.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just NIT comment
Continuation of changes started in #12890.