Skip to content

[CI] force overwrite for iga64 in igc dev driver #16073

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

[CI] force overwrite for iga64 in igc dev driver #16073

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

jsji
Copy link
Contributor

@jsji jsji commented Nov 13, 2024

Fix the installation failures.

dpkg: error processing archive intel-igc-opencl-devel_2.1.0+0_amd64.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite '/usr/local/bin/iga64', which is also in package intel-igc-media 1.0.17791.9
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Setting up intel-igc-core-2 (2.1.0) ...

Fix the installation failures.

dpkg: error processing archive intel-igc-opencl-devel_2.1.0+0_amd64.deb (--install):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/local/bin/iga64', which is also in package intel-igc-media 1.0.17791.9
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Setting up intel-igc-core-2 (2.1.0) ...
@jsji jsji requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 16:09
@jsji jsji self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sarnex sarnex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm but this sounds like a packaging bug, should we report it to igc?

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsji commented Nov 13, 2024

lgtm but this sounds like a packaging bug, should we report it to igc?

yes, please, at least to double confirm whether it is intended to package iga64 now.

@sarnex
Copy link
Contributor

sarnex commented Nov 13, 2024

@jsji Sorry should I make the bug report or will you handle it?

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsji commented Nov 13, 2024

@jsji Sorry should I make the bug report or will you handle it?

Please help to open bug report . Thanks.

@sarnex
Copy link
Contributor

sarnex commented Nov 13, 2024

@jsjj I think this is expected actually. The igc build stopped putting iga64 in the media package here (and maybe removed the whole media package, idk). However in our build script we install the latest public IGC release and then the dev version, and the latest public release is before that PR so it still has the media package. I think this should automatically be fixed with the next IGC public release.

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsji commented Nov 13, 2024

@jsjj I think this is expected actually. The igc build stopped putting iga64 in the media package here (and maybe removed the whole media package, idk). However in our build script we install the latest public IGC release and then the dev version, and the latest public release is before that PR so it still has the media package. I think this should automatically be fixed with the next IGC public release.

Thanks @sarnex ! Yes, good to know that.

@sarnex
Copy link
Contributor

sarnex commented Nov 13, 2024

gen12 fail not related #16077

@sarnex sarnex merged commit 29f26fe into sycl Nov 13, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
@bader bader deleted the igcdevinstall branch December 24, 2024 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants