Skip to content

[test-e2e][L0] do not rely on specific log format #16897

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

igchor
Copy link
Member

@igchor igchor commented Feb 5, 2025

from UR_L0_DEBUG.

L0 API logging will most likely be moved to the
L0 loader and we would like to keep formatting
consistent with current logger format, this means
no "ZE --->" prefix.

@igchor igchor requested review from a team as code owners February 5, 2025 22:47
@igchor igchor requested a review from uditagarwal97 February 5, 2025 22:47
@igchor igchor force-pushed the test_l0_logs_loader branch from b9b2e5d to 9c331e4 Compare February 6, 2025 17:06
@igchor
Copy link
Member Author

igchor commented Feb 6, 2025

@intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime could you please take a look? The test failure is not related (the test is also failing for other PRs).

Copy link
Contributor

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

from UR_L0_DEBUG.

L0 API logging will most likely be moved to the
L0 loader and we would like to keep formatting
consistent with current logger format, this means
no "ZE --->" prefix.
@igchor
Copy link
Member Author

igchor commented Feb 19, 2025

Failure is a known issue: #16877

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers this is ready to be merged

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 merged commit 1072231 into intel:sycl Feb 19, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants