Skip to content

[CI][UR] Disable UR benchmarking workflows #17281

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

ianayl
Copy link
Contributor

@ianayl ianayl commented Mar 3, 2025

Temporarily disable UR benchmarking workflows, as they will be moved into a development branch. The workflow triggers are left intact in order to be used in development branches.

The workflows being disabled temporarily as they require a security review + necessary security approvals.

@ianayl ianayl requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 20:43
@ianayl ianayl changed the title Disable UR workflows [CI][UR] Disable UR workflows Mar 3, 2025
@ianayl ianayl temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 3, 2025 20:43 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 requested a review from pbalcer March 3, 2025 20:45
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 changed the title [CI][UR] Disable UR workflows [CI][UR] Disable UR benchmarking workflows Mar 3, 2025
@ianayl ianayl temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock March 3, 2025 21:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@ianayl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianayl commented Mar 4, 2025

@intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers This PR's ready for review, thanks!

@ianayl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianayl commented Mar 4, 2025

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers PR is ready for merge, thanks in advance!

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 merged commit 6383579 into sycl Mar 4, 2025
23 checks passed
@ianayl ianayl deleted the ianayl/disable-ur-workflows branch March 4, 2025 22:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants